On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 11:38:40PM +0200, Michael Neuffer wrote: > Quoting Kurt Roeckx (Q@ping.be): > > On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Michael Neuffer wrote: > > > > > > Additionally it is necessary that we build this port in a way that > > > we don't block the paths to a simple migration to a biarch ports > > > from the 64bit pure port. > > > > > > I think this is what most pure 64bit protagonists don't like to > > > think about because it makes things much more complicated for them. > > > > I thought we didn't want biarch and wanted multiarch. And I > > think it should be easier to migrate from pure64 to multiarch. > > How do you define the difference between biarch and multiarch ? biarch is the old /lib /lib64 FHS/LSB way. Multiarch is the new system that uses /lib/(gcc version)/ with symlinks for /lib /lib64 which can support more than two archs on the same system. I believe that aj and taggart have more information on their websites. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature