Re: The new Social Contract and releasing Sarge
Frank Küster wrote:
> The point is that many people expected that such action would
>
> - lower our chances for an agreement with the FSF
Current assessment seems to be that it's the opposite; lack of such action
has led the FSF to ignore Debian.
> - worsen the relationship between individual package maintainers and
> upstream.
Even when upstream is FSF-owned, this probably won't happen. Requesting
licensing changes from upstream before removing packages is always good
practice, of course.
> And this would in turn lower the chances that these upstream
> authors are willing to relicense their work, should the discussions
> with the FSF _not_ succeed.
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Reply to: