On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 05:15:00PM +0200, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 14:14, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > > And to bring that naming issue up again. Wouldn't it be best just to call them > > libpear-something og libphp-something ? > > That is the naming scheme mostly used all over Debian (libapache, libperl, etc.) > > I think something like that probably should be defined, before they are introduced. > Also versioning (PHP4/5) should be considered in the package namings. > Some new PEAR package will only work with PHP5, some work with both. > I am not sure how Perl solves this versioning problem, if it exists > there :) > I also want to note that the PEAR package in Debian should work as the > CPAN one. Installation of PEAR packages via "pear install $package_name" > should be done in /usr/local... but debian pear packages put them into > /usr.. > the php.ini just needs to know both paths in the "include_path" option Please file a bug about this if there isn't one open already. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature