Re: /media for sarge?
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:32:31 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> said:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Timothy Demulder wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:37:28 +0100
>> Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Does nobody read changelogs any more? :-)
>> >
>> > base-files (3.0.13) unstable; urgency=low
>> >
>> > * Added /srv, /media and /usr/local/share/man (Closes: #230909).
>> > [...]
>>
>> base-files 3.0.14 in sid, but I can't find /media,/srv or
>> /usr/local/share/man on my system.
> Achieving FHS compliance by upgrading could be sometimes very
> tricky. Please perform FHS compliance tests on newly installed
> systems only.
Umm. How would creation of these new directories impact my
system? I agree that my fstab ought not to be mucked with, but
creating three dirs if they do not already exists ought to hurt
nothing?
> If you use the latest base-files to install a new system, you will
> get /srv, /media, etc.
And are we abandoning the machines already running Debian? Why
do they not get FHS compliant, since third party software which one
might install may soon rely on the new directories?
manoj
--
A writer is congenitally unable to tell the truth and that is why we
call what he writes fiction. William Faulkner
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: