Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> writes:
> Frankly, I don't see that that definition has the flaws you've claimed
> it has. [For example, if there are equivalent representations and one
> is the preferred form then any of them are the preferred form.]
Well, Ted said that there was a disaster in progress. That might be a
flaw.
> Anyways, status quo is: some of us use a definition of "source code"
> which you disagree with.
Sure, that's fine by me; you can go ahead and use that definition,
just don't presume that it's been decided by authority in Debian.
It's one plausible definition, and it's an excellent place to start.
Reply to: