Hi Jeroen! On 2004-04-28 0:25 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Maybe you should have deliberated with the release-management team. I deliberately chose to immediately make it visible to all developers. After all this was not an actual proposal, but a basis for discussion. As such, I wanted as many opinions as possible, and I did not exclude the release team. > There is one important caveat with this proposal. I'll contact you > privately about this: I'm sure it is far from perfect, that's why I want to discuss it first :-) > a GR is already in the make, hopefully providing a > sensefull roadmap to go forward. It's currently going through some > editorial changes right now ;), and will be posted here really soon now. Okay, since you seem to have worked longer and with more people, then I would like to postpone my proposal and the discussion about it until yours appears. > I think it's more productive to come up with a well-thoughtover, > well-supported GR, especially regarding the discussion that will surely > follow: I'd really like that to be a bit structured if possible. I tried to structure it by legal/technical/etc., but maybe your's is better. It is my first try, I'm willing to learn :-) But I strongly feel that _something_ must done to rescue Debian's reputation. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer martin@piware.de mpitt@debian.org http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature