Re: Bug#133578: gdm bug #133578. Intend to NMU.
Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>> Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 09:49:57AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>> >> We talked about whether a maintainer is entitled to
>> >> refuse after more than a year a bug
>> >
>> > He's not "refusing the bug", whatever that means.
>>
>> Refuse _a bug fix_ (the word fix was scrapped god knows why).
>>
>> > He's refusing a fix which he thinks isn't.
>>
>> Don't be hyperrelativist.
>
> I'm not. Ryan has indicated that he does not believe the provided fix is
> a clean one.
>
>> When a bug exists and no longer occurs after applying a patch, the fix
>> is indeed a fix.
>
> Are you being deliberatively obtrusive, or are you just plain stupid?
At least, I were not insulting you. Since you are apparently unable to
stay polite, there is no purpose in reading your crap any further.
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: