On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 01:23 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 21:02 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 09:59:53AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > > > As an aside... or as a possibly related issue, consider glibc -- here > > > > is a piece of software which is licensed as free (though RMS might say > > > > that the LGPL licensed components aren't as free as he'd like), but > > > > which in practice is still distributed in almost-binary form (you > > > > can't build current versions of glibc on linux without having > > > > extremely current binaries because the version skew is so great). In > > > > essence, the preferred form for working with this software must > > > > include its binaries... > > > > > > I suggest we all give up and go back to the abacus. > > > > > Have you got the sources to one handy? :o) > > Well, you start with cutting down a tree... ;-) > THAT TREE IS NON-FREE... Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part