Hi Fabio! On 2004-04-18 23:16 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Martin Pitt wrote: > > If putting a file into conf.d/ is regarded as "mangling user changes", > > then why was conf.d/ introduced in the first place? > > Using conf.d is ok. Okay, then I will leave it as it currently is. > As I wrote in another mail to this thread i can't > remember all the exact details for each package, but if i remember > correctly there is something wrong with the grep/echo >> you do to > httpd.conf (but i will check it again if you want me to) No, I don't echo anything into httpd.conf, I just grep this file for an existing Alias and if it is not there, I echo an Alias to conf.d/fibusql. So I guess that this report was a false positive :-) > > If there is a standard and clean way to install web applications, I > > would be happy to get to know and implement it. I just don't want to > > put the scripts into the sitewide DocumentRoot directory. > > Well we can only suggest to use conf.d. I fully agree. conf.d/ is a great enhancement for web applications. > > > Package: fibusql > > > Maintainer: Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org> > > > Problem: It does not depend/support apache-perl > > > > Oops, did not know about this package either, I will support it in the > > future. Currently fibusql does not depend on just httpd since I don't > > know a way to install a web application in arbitrary webservers. Now that the other issue has settled, I will upload a new version supporting apache-perl soon. > > Thanks in advance for any hints! > > Thanks to you for your fast response! You too :-) Have a nice day, Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer martin@piware.de mpitt@debian.org http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature