Re: mass RC-bug filing? deps on libart-2.0-2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Is (mass-)filing serious bugs against those pkgs ok?
> > > (adding build-conflicts against that libart version and rebuilding with
> > > the fixed one)
> >
> > Isn't broken build env a use case of binNMU[1] ? However, as most packages
> > depending on libart are huge, it might be worth bugging the maintainer, if
> > there is a new upload coming soon anyway.
>
> Bin-NMU those on all archs which are affected?
>
> I don't think this is a very good way.
I forgot to meantion that this bug was introduced weeks ago and many of
the packages even had an upload since then so many of them will have
this problem on all archs.
I am just updating my mirror and will check on the Packages files
later...
Grüße/Regards,
René
- --
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAfya4+FmQsCSK63MRAnAJAJwPiBmXr4JDr3BHOwGSnRG2Vnps6ACdEReM
oR9thsuM/lajZCWznaPaUbY=
=vq0q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: