Chris Cheney wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:32:10PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > > but maybe someone else could be so kindly and code it. > > > > The first step would be to muster a consensus that it is indeed always > > wrong to have no .diff.gz for a package with an upstream author > > outside Debian. I'm not quite sure such a consensus exists today. > > A more accurate statement would be it is always wrong to have no > .diff.gz unless the package is only useful for Debian. Not just with an > upstream author outside Debian. There are very few packages in Debian > that should be native. More accurate, perhaps, but much less likely to be a consensus. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature