On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:32:10PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > but maybe someone else could be so kindly and code it. > > The first step would be to muster a consensus that it is indeed always > wrong to have no .diff.gz for a package with an upstream author > outside Debian. I'm not quite sure such a consensus exists today. A more accurate statement would be it is always wrong to have no .diff.gz unless the package is only useful for Debian. Not just with an upstream author outside Debian. There are very few packages in Debian that should be native. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature