On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:50:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:22:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > There was little point holding up 4.3.0's progress into sarge because of > > it; the exact same bug is present in XFree86 4.2.1, already in sarge. > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libx11-6 > > I don't disagree with that. > > All I'm saying is that suh a bug is IMHO release critical in the sense > "should be fixed before the next stable release". Jesus christ, how much time do you want to spend on X? sarge *should* ship with either xorg, or fd.o's X. sarge *should* ship with a brand-spanking GNOME. sarge *should* have autoconfiguring X. sarge *should* have out-of-the-box wireless, LDAP authentication, et al, support. It doesn't make *any* of these RC. important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I am release-managing. However, it is most certainly not RC. Please don't go around making stupid suggestions like this: you might give other people ideas. 'REALEASE FASTER! NO NOT LIKE THAT YOU FOOLS,' Daniel -- Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org> Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature