hi manoj, On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:49:34PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > They have a point; there is a new mechanism in FVWM that > generates a configuration file for a new user if none exists; and > this config is better than the one we ship. Indeed, our packaging is > outdated, and shadows neat new features in the fvwm install, making > the experience for Debian users significantly worse. > > > As an example I agree with Mikhael that there shouldn't be a system-wide > > default fvwm config: Dan's excellent work to bring up a configurator for > > new FVWM users shouldn't be hidden by years-old crusty configuration > > files. if we dropped the system-wide configuration file, would it still be possible to include the debian programs menu? sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature