Re: Co-maintaining Kaffe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
David B Harris <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:35:22 -0500
> Clint Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > (And before anybody suggests "tech-ctte doesn't do anything", it'll
>> > never get "fixed" until there's a reason for it to be fixed.)
>> I suggest that the tech-ctte has done too much already.
> Got a better suggestion then? With Ean's mail to -devel, it's pretty
> apparent that these two can't work it out amongst themselves. I would
> think that a group of people doing what the tech-ctte is supposed to
> be doing would be the ideal people to hear both sides and make an
> (enforced) decision on the matter.
I got no mail from Ean about this problem before the mail on the
list(s)! (See my response).
Also, I don't know why it's on -devel? kaffe is -java related... Why was
it cross posted?.. I do read both lists (and I also receive the mail
personally!). Who is talking about following the rules? ;-)
: :' :rnaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----