Re: What's the point scanning 'stable'? Re: Bug#233345: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package emacs21
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:15:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:00:58AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Why did you consider 'stable' packages in your script?
> > > This results in many duplicate bug reports.
> > > Only unstable/testing package should have been scanned.
> > It was likely an artifact of this:
> > emacs21 | 21.2-1.0.1 | unstable | hurd-i386
> Ah. I didn't realized hurd packages were so outdated.
There is no hurd-i386 buildd running at the moment.