Re: What's the point scanning 'stable'? Re: Bug#233345: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package emacs21
Quoting Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:00:58AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Steve McIntyre <email@example.com>:
> > > Package: emacs21
> > > Version: 21.2-1.0.1
> > > Severity: normal
> > Steve,
> > Why did you consider 'stable' packages in your script?
> > This results in many duplicate bug reports.
> > Only unstable/testing package should have been scanned.
> It was likely an artifact of this:
> emacs21 | 21.2-1.0.1 | unstable | hurd-i386
Ah. I didn't realized hurd packages were so outdated.