Re: What's the point scanning 'stable'? Re: Bug#233345: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package emacs21
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:00:58AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Steve McIntyre <email@example.com>:
> > Package: emacs21
> > Version: 21.2-1.0.1
> > Severity: normal
> Why did you consider 'stable' packages in your script?
> This results in many duplicate bug reports.
> Only unstable/testing package should have been scanned.
It was likely an artifact of this:
emacs21 | 21.2-1.0.1 | unstable | hurd-i386
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]