Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:08:55 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040215030855.GX12277@alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040215015257.GU18199@einval.com>
References: <[🔎] 20040215015257.GU18199@einval.com>

On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:52:57AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:

> I'm considering posting bugs against packages in the list asking for
> more sensible package splits. Comments?

Go for it.

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

References:
- Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Next by Date: Re: ntp 4.2.0 in experimental
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Next by thread: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread