Re: links and elinks (Was: Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional)
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:47:13 +0100, Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>
wrote:
>I agree that links is a better choice. However, I think that links is
>a way better choice than elinks -- especially since the development
>made the last two years.
Please point me to a links (not elinks) package that can do http auth
(see #218450).
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Reply to: