Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional

[Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:14:17PM +1100, Brian May wrote:

> My main observation:
> 
> links:
>         supports frames; I have yet to decide if this is good or bad.
>         frame support means the main text can be pushed over to the right
>         past the edge of the window where it can't be seen.
> 
> w3m
>         supports http_proxy, and related environment variables.
> 
>         supports images (when w3m-img is installed). Yes, this can be
>         kind of buggy, at least with gnome-terminal, but it means I can use
>         w3m when I normally would have required to load Mozilla.

w3m also supports frames.

-- 
 - mdz