Re: do builds rebuild uploaded .debs

[Bob Hilliard <hilliard@debian.org>]

Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:17:04PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
>> "Laurence J. Lane" <ljlane@nontoxic.org> writes:
>
>> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:54:37AM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
>
>> >>      On January 8 I uploaded dictd-1.9.11-1, including
>> >> dict*_1.9.11-1_i386.deb files. In the archive on master, I see
>> >> 1.9.11-1 on hppa, mipsel, powerpc, and sparc, but 1.9.10-3 on i386
>> >> and the other architectures (except arm which has 1.9.10-2). Are
>> >> the builds now re-building the uploaded architecture as well as
>> >> the other architectures?
>
>> > packages.debian.org/dictd shows all except the hurd at 1.9.11-1.
>
>>      The Packages files on master now show:
>
>>       alpha 1.9.10-3
>>       arm 1.9.10-2
>>       hppa 1.9.11-1
>>       i386 1.9.11-1
>>       ia64 1.9.11-1
>>       m68k 1.9.10-3
>>       mips 1.9.10-3
>>       mipsel 1.9.10-3
>>       powerpc 1.9.10-3
>>       s390 1.9.11-1
>>       sparc 1.9.10-3
>
>>      Although i386 now shows 1.9.11, 7 architectures have older
>> versions on master.  I wonder if packages.d.o is accurate?
>
> Which Packages files are these?  The Packages files on gluck definitely
> show everything in sync.

     Thanks, Steve and Colin.  I have switched my madison-lite script
from master to gluck, and all is fine now.  I had used "locate" on
master to find Packages.gz, and used:
   /org/bugs.debian.org/etc/indices/ftp/$2/main/binary-*/Packages.gz,
where $2 is the desired distribution, in my script.

Regards,

Bob
-- 
   _
  |_)  _  |_    Robert D. Hilliard        <hilliard@debian.org>
  |_) (_) |_)   1294 S.W. Seagull Way     <bob@bobhilliard.net>
                Palm City, FL 34990 USA   GPG Key ID: 390D6559