Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: Nikolai Prokoschenko <nikolai@prokoschenko.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:19:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040111201921.GA30415@nikolai.prokoschenko.pc>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 06:23:39AM +1030, Dan Shearer wrote:

> So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant packages)
> which should be in Debian but are not? And why do you think they are
> not?

mplayer will definitely make the top 5, it illustrates some of the
bottle-necks of Debian or better, of the upstream. When two perfect ones
meet ;)

-- 
Nikolai Prokoschenko 
nikolai@prokoschenko.de / Jabber: pronik@jabber.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Nano Nano <40101.nospam@comcast.net>

References:
- Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by Date: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread