[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, utilizing it in debian/rules clean

Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 03:47:08PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> consider #216747, where a package declares "Build-Depends-Indep:
>> debhelper" and uses e.g. dh_clean in the debian/rules clean target.
>> Build-Depends-Indep is defined to be satisfied in the build,
>> build-indep, binary and binary-indep targets, but not in clean.
>> For the main distribution, "grep Build-Depends-Indep .../Sources|grep
>> debhelper|wc -l" results in 1871 packages. I didn't check all of them
>> but I doubt that many of them also declare "Build-Depends: debhelper" or
>> don't use dh_clean in the clean target. So >>1000 source packages seem
>> to behave like the package in #216747.
> [...]
> I think you are overestimating the issue. Contrary to policy the
> buildds do not install Build-Depends-Indep when running
> debian/rules build so these bugs are found fast.

*cough* What about Architecture: all?

I've written a lintian check for this issue, see #214231.

$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse   # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>

Reply to: