[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#223772: general: no md5sums for many packages (e.g. bc)



David Weinehall wrote:
> And documentation?  Hell, use the source-code.
Source code? Who needs source code?

Seriously: I've had some problems with file system corruption every now
and then. The md5sums are a nice way to check whether the basic binaries
on the disk are still what I'd like them to be without having to have
install media at hand.
I'd agree that there is no security implication in having them or not,
but there's features besides security.

Cheers

T.

Attachment: pgpSE9CVWY9C4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: