Re: cvs versioning
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: cvs versioning
- From: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:25:36 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87brqb63pr.fsf@oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be>
- In-reply-to: <12vTJ-5e2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (Peter S. Galbraith's message of "Sun, 14 Dec 2003 05:20:11 +0100")
- References: <12q7G-45w-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <12vTJ-5e2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <12vTJ-5e2-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org> wrote:
[...]
>> 3.2.1. Version numbers based on dates
>> -------------------------------------
[...]
> I started a thread on -policy recently where I suggested this was bad
> and should be something like 0.19960501 instead, to avoid epochs when
> upstream finally declares a 1.0 release.
I've just read it, thanks for the pointer.
--
.''`. Arnaud Vandyck
: :' : http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/
`. `'
`-
Reply to: