Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1
Adrian Bunk <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:53:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > I haven't found it explicitely mentioned, but the logial version number
> > > for a binary NMU of version 1.0 would be 1.0-0.0.1 .
> > A binary NMU implies you haven't changed the source. If you change the
> > version number you have changed the source and must upload it too.
> > Thus binary NMU must have the same version number.
> That's wrong.
> Please read section 220.127.116.11. of your Developer's Reference.
Ok, the hopefully nowadays very rare "magic" version bumping to get a
recompile of an already install package uploaded.
Does that happen anymore?