Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?

[Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>]

Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org> wrote:

> Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> a tapoté :
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:04:27AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> >> Scripsit Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>
> >
> >> > So, "dfsg-lint", maybe.
> >
> >> I think my critique against "debian-legalint" applies here too.
> >
> >> How about something boring and accurate, say, "apt-show-sections"?
> >
> > vrms++? ;)
> 
> :)
> 
> 
> So, what is the next step? Removing GNU for the Debian GNU/Linux?

I don't see why that would be the next step.  This is not an anti-GNU
proposition.  It a recognition that we're using different criteria to
establish freeness (e.g. GFDL) so let's not get RMS mad at us for using
his name in an improper way.