Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
Mathieu Roy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Steve Langasek <email@example.com> a tapoté :
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:04:27AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> >> Scripsit Rick Moen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> > So, "dfsg-lint", maybe.
> >> I think my critique against "debian-legalint" applies here too.
> >> How about something boring and accurate, say, "apt-show-sections"?
> > vrms++? ;)
> So, what is the next step? Removing GNU for the Debian GNU/Linux?
I don't see why that would be the next step. This is not an anti-GNU
proposition. It a recognition that we're using different criteria to
establish freeness (e.g. GFDL) so let's not get RMS mad at us for using
his name in an improper way.