[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?



On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 07:15:15PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> [1] Am I the only one here that mentally associates vrms with
> root-mean-square (i.e. as opposed to peak-to-peak) voltage rather than
> "Virtual Richard M Stallman" by default?

My default interpretation is root-mean-square wattage.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: