Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?
Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> a tapoté :
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:04:27AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>
>
>> > So, "dfsg-lint", maybe.
>
>> I think my critique against "debian-legalint" applies here too.
>
>> How about something boring and accurate, say, "apt-show-sections"?
>
> vrms++? ;)
:)
So, what is the next step? Removing GNU for the Debian GNU/Linux?
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: