[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [debian-devel] Re: Is vrms really still a Virtual Richard M. Stallman?



Magosányi Árpád wrote:

> A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Florian Weimer a következőeket írta:
> > Let me rephrase my statement.  "non-free" does not mean "not conforming
> > to the law".
> 
> Non-free does mean "not conforming to the internal law of the project".

The Social Contract mandates that Debian offers non-free software for
download, so you can hardly argue that doing so breaks Debian's own
laws.



Reply to: