Re: Example of really nasty DD behavior
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net> writes:
> Duck, perhaps you should have written the ITP earlier. Instead of
> complaining, why don't you thank your fellow developer and offer to
> co-maintain the package. Perhaps the package could benefit from your
> combined efforts.
>
As Martin Pitt said, I think it's wise contacting related persons, look at
the program, and then, when you relly want to package it, write an ITP.
I won't post hundreds of ITPs in advance to be sure to get the packages i
like and then reopen them when i don't those.
I said i contacted people, looked à the program, but i didn't package
anything. My ITP so came just before any real packaging work, and i don't
think doing it earlier would have been adequate.
I don't think this "fellow developer" wants to share HIS package with anybody.
And i don't think i'd like to work with a guy who is unable to communicate.
I was just complaining about his behavior, i don't mind having this package
or not. I've got enought packages to deal with, i just wanted to help the
gnome packaging team (Sebastien Bacher is actually my sponsor) because this
nice program was missing.
Duck
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/t3hCsczZcpAmcIYRAtGaAJ9fc/EZuub23Df4/gVAw579nRt3XwCeJXi/
ngTtikWG7tFbuyHXj4020zA=
=ngvk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: