Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:54, Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> wrote:
> > This is so ugly.
>
> Last I looked, there wasn't much in NIS that wasn't. I think the amount
> of pain we should put other users through on account of NIS is very
> small (e.g., no longer asking about non-md5 passwords on install).
Sounds reasonable.
I guess we could make it all install for non-NIS systems by default and assume
that anyone who knows how to get NIS properly installed can sort out the
necessary changes.
When comparing distributions they sometimes count the number of questions
asked at installation, by such a comparison Debian does very badly. While I
don't think that we should be aiming for a dozen questions on an install, I
think that we can productively remove some of the less common options.
Reply to: