Re: Bug#220401: ITP: linux-experimental -- Linux 2.4 kernel [EXPERIMENTAL PACKAGE]
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> Just thought I should give you a better reply.
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> > >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
> > Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
> > believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
> > you believe would be in a linux-kernel package? When someone says
> > "Linux", do you think they generally mean something massively different
> > to when they say "NetBSD"?
> These questions are ambigous. Any response I could came up would fit on them.
> The relevant question here is not what "someone generaly means", but rather
> what "something is".
> The following question would make more sense:
> "Do you think Linux is something massively different than NetBSD?"
> (You could respond to it, btw)
Why aren't you answering the questions?