On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:03:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:52:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Er, actually, last I heard, the author was still looking into > > > > relicensing it in a manner consistent with XFree86's requirements. > > > > (They don't accept GPLed code.) > > > > > > that's what he told me too. He also said he is still unable to contact > > > every single contributor to confirm the license change. > > > > Bummer. > > There is one unreachable person; IIRC, he was a reasonably major > contributor. Double bummer. > I was thinking about xfree86-driver-synaptics, or > xfree86-driver-input-synaptics, but the last one is too unnecessarily > longwinded. (I was going to package this as an XSF project, post-exams). I thought about the latter as well. It's not too long-winded if we expect having input and video modules with identical names. Is the XFree86 driver namespace subdivided in practice (i.e., in a name-resolution sense), or merely cosmetically via directory layout? -- G. Branden Robinson | Sometimes, getting your patch in is Debian GNU/Linux | just a matter of waiting for branden@debian.org | somebody else to reimplement it. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Jonathan Corbet
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature