[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Fwd: Bug#219258: openmosix patches do not apply cleanly to debian kernels



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Em Qua 05 Nov 2003 11:52, Stephen Frost escreveu:
> * Daniel Rog?rio de Souza (daniel@souzas.homelinux.net) wrote:
> > "OpenMosix Kernel Patch" patch for 2.4.20 does not apply cleanly
>
> That I can believe but I'm not entirely sure which way I'd like to go
> with that.
>
> > And when I try to apply the openmosix patch to a 2.4.22-3 debian kernel I
> > get:
> >
> > Testing whether "OpenMosix Kernel Patch" patch for 2.4.22 applies (dry
> > run): 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
> > "OpenMosix Kernel Patch" patch for 2.4.22 does not apply cleanly
>
> Heh, blame Xu then for changing things that affected the patch.  The
> 2.4.22 patch worked against the Debian kernel I tried it against when I
> first uploaded it.  It's rather obnoxious that he makes changes that
> would cause problems like this in minor revisions.
>
> Of course, the other problem is that if I hack up the patch to apply
> against the Debian kernels it probably won't apply against the
> mainstream ones, which are the ones I'm honestly more interested in
> supporting because those are the ones I use.

I respect Stephen Frost's opinion and I'm in fact not in a position to argue 
that opinion. But, as a Debian user I ask, if I want to use a Debian kernel 
patch can't I expect to be able to use a Debian kernel? As a desktop user I 
have to be able to manage the kernel security by myself, following security 
alerts and finding security patches? Is it practical or feasible?

Regards,

Daniel Rogério de Souza
souza_daniel@bigfoot.com
http://danielsouza.rg3.net

P.S. I'm not subscribed, so please CC me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/qodKxAaUHFfFIWoRAu8sAKCVZCodTzQ0uQmJhg9IIJIEyvq75QCgrvY1
bY7t0AxU9Tez5Z46BcL8VV4=
=1bnT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: