On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:14, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote: > > > Before that realization, it seemed like the type of random cruft that > > sometimes gets pulled in on dist-upgrade; a name change would help > > alleviate that initial perception, IMO. Why not libc6-linux-headers? > > I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering > about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not > linux-kernel-* or linux-* ? If alternative kernels in debian become > more popular, is there a potential for confusion in the future? Here we GO again... Martin Kraaft? Herbert Xu? among others... Ready for another "heated" debate. -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part