On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:26:42PM -0300, Tiago Assumpção wrote: > First of all, maybe the most important, we have the freedom problem here. > It�s CLEAR, after analyzing his own words, that our friend Russell Coker > has a big interest of getting Exec-shield as part of Debian Linux. > That becomes even more clear when you see the affirmation, again his own > words, he's employed by Red Hat. > > I won't say here that Red Hat, Inc. would be manipulating information > to force Debian users to use one of their products, because I would be going > down, at the same level as Coker. Since I don't know Red Hat's relationship > to this issue, I would go for how non-professional Russel Coker has been > with his posts. I think you're making unwarranted assumpçãos. -- G. Branden Robinson | I suspect Linus wrote that in a Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to branden@debian.org | have that comment in there. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature