Re: 2.5/2.6 IPsec stack should live in a kernel-patch!
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:31:47PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 01:38:45 +0200
> firstname.lastname@example.org (Domenico Andreoli) wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.]
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:56:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thus I propose that Herbert should remove the IPsec patch and make
> > > > it a separate kernel-patch. If anyone has other objections than "I
> > > > won't do it because it's my choice, I don't feel like it, and
> > > > there is nothing you can do about it", then please speak up. On
> > > > the other hand, if you agree with me, let your voice be heard!
> > >
> > i'm interested only in the debian kernel without 2.5/2.6 IPsec. in my
> > mind this should be vanilla kernel + debian fixes.
> But.... 2.5/2.6 include IPSEC in the vanilla kernel!
But.... 2.4 doesn't. And it's not a bug fix. It's a new feature.
IMHO... It should not be in the 'vanilla' kernel.