Re: Question about libcdda_paranoia

[Henning Moll <newsScott@gmx.de>]

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and
> therefore live in development packages.

Thank you for that information!

But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b. 
This programm tries to dlopen (=at runtime) 'libcdda_paranoia.so'. But 
that is only possible if package 'libcdparanoia0-dev' is installed. 
This would mean a dependency to a development package. 
Is this a bug in k3b? Should k3b try to dlopen 'libcdda_paranoia.so.0' 
instead? Is there a standard for so-naming (which is respected by all/
most Gnu/Linux distributions)?

Where can i learn more about the naming of share object files?

Thanks in advance!
Henning