[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

also sprach Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> [2003.10.06.2220 +0200]:
> I beg your pardon?  Why do you believe that the _stable
> distribution security FAQ_ is relevant to this argument?

Because it is the only thing I could find that reflects Debian's
take on security fixes: feature backports are to be avoided. Branden
correctly states that feature imports are frequently used in other
packages, but you can't name a single package on whose byte-by-byte
code other packages depend. kernel-source is the only one,
I believe, and so it takes a special role.

Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: pgpHSwVQzjtN0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: