Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But this is strange. Why does lts-core include it's own version of
> > busybox and X and other packages? Why not use the Debian packages and
> > unpack them into the lts-root? What about security fixes as the recent
> > one in xfree86? Those don't get onto the lts-clients until a new lts is
> > uploaded.
>
> FWIW, last time I tried I found that it was rather difficult to run
> debootstrap from within a package postinst script... at least with
> debconf using an interactive frontend. :)
Yes. debootstrap in postinst is not a good idea. It is likely to fail
and takes tool long. But a tool on top of debootstrap and the ltsp
generation scripts should allow that kind of updating and would not
require new ltsp packages for every security advisory.
Robert.
--
Kiss your keyboard goodbye!
Attachment:
pgpO9C7AX3NR2.pgp
Description: PGP signature