On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote: > Hello! > [Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote: > > | /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the > > | clients can be regenerated, that should go into > > | /var/lib/ltsp/<arch>. > > No, in LTSP the one root filesystem image is static data shared between > > all clients of a given arch and can't be regenerated except by > > reinstalling LTSP: thus it belongs in /usr not /var. Also it is > Oh yes. You are right. I thought the root tree was still being gererated > from the host server's tree, but those times seem to have passed. > But this is strange. Why does lts-core include it's own version of > busybox and X and other packages? Why not use the Debian packages and > unpack them into the lts-root? What about security fixes as the recent > one in xfree86? Those don't get onto the lts-clients until a new lts is > uploaded. FWIW, last time I tried I found that it was rather difficult to run debootstrap from within a package postinst script... at least with debconf using an interactive frontend. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature