also sprach Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk> [2003.09.21.1614 +0200]: > >FWIW, I basically agree. "goodies" are welcome, but backporting > >things from the unstable branch migh= t not be that good idea. > > Should we stop shipping security fixes backported from development > code? It always depends, doesn't it? We are backporting *security* fixes to packages, but we take care not to introduce new features. I don't oppose some small modifications to the kernel, fixes and security backports, but including a 2.5 IPsec stack in 2.4.21 is kinda not in accordance with that policy, now is it? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
pgpvhr0zYYMVP.pgp
Description: PGP signature