On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 20:17, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > There's at least one other solution: what if, when a bug tagged
> > "upstream" was closed, the mail sent would include the upstream
> > ChangeLog (hopefully named ChangeLog in the top directory of the
> > package)?
> > Can someone familiar with the BTS code tell whether this change is
> > trivial or not?
>
> It's not trivial in the slightest, sorry. The BTS doesn't remotely have
> this information available to it, and it's not even easy to arrange for
> it to be available.
I'd also be quite annoyed if I was mailed the upstream changelog when a
bug was closed, as these can often get rather large.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com
jabber: ross@jabber.debian.net
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part