Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:12:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters
> > again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for
> > several days.
>
> Why not make your tmda package depend on amavis-new and clamav-freshclam? If
> they are installed and correctly configured then virus filters should get
> updated as fast as is possible.
Does Amavis automatically configure itself for whatever MTA is installed and
start scanning mail immediately? If not, then I don't see how a Depends:
would help. I would consider adding a Suggests: or Recommends:.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>
Reply to: