Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote:
> When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters
> again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for
> several days.
Why not make your tmda package depend on amavis-new and clamav-freshclam? If
they are installed and correctly configured then virus filters should get
updated as fast as is possible.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: