On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:14:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > The term is "an ifupdown NMU". For crying out loud, it's been NMUed four times in a row already.. > You certainly should not be considering hijacking it. Why not? Do you have a new maintainer release which acknowledges NMUs, incorporates some fixes you have accumulated for the vast number of bugs that this package has? Is this a call for comaintenance (which I would definitely recommend for a package of this importance?) If not, maybe you should pass it on. -- Joshua Kwan
Attachment:
pgpOy8RjUwKS1.pgp
Description: PGP signature