Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
From: "Paul C. Bryan" <email@pbryan.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:50:54 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 3F45AF3E.8050200@pbryan.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030818224513.GA6650@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
References: <[🔎] 3F402A81.3060509@pbryan.net> <[🔎] 20030818224513.GA6650@prvidomaci.srce.hr>

Josip Rodin wrote:

BTW gimp(1.2)-nonfree was recently obsoleted.


Because it is making way for 1.3 presumably?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>

References:
- Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
  - From: "Paul C. Bryan" <email@pbryan.net>
- Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>

Prev by Date: Re: Bits from the RM
Next by Date: Re: FTBFS: architecture all packages
Previous by thread: Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
Next by thread: Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread