Re: Bits from the RM
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:08:28AM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> On 2003-08-20 10:13, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>
> > > On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
> > > > about 2003-12-01 00:00:00 UTC?
>
> > > Do you have some Official Opinion(tm)[1] as the RM about what KDE, gcc,
> > > X, gnome versions will be in sarge?
>
> > KDE 3.1.4 (KDE 2.2 _will not_ stay in sarge!)
>
> kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll wait
> for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again immediately after
> release?
What recent change in the KDE releasing schema let you think that they will
manage to get a really stable x.y.0 release [*] when it seems like it took 4
minor releases in the 3.1 branch ?
Naturally, no offense intended to the kde guys. Needing only 4 minor releases
to stabilize such an amount of code is really great.
Bye, Mt.
[*] ie, suitable for debian stable release, ie a version with which you
could live for a year on your desktop, maybe dreaming of new features (we
always want more), but not pesting against the bugs.
I speak of course of the ideal debian stable release ;)
--
Testing can only prove the presence of bugs.
--- Dijkstra
Reply to: